BIM-BASED DESIGN DECISIONS DOCUMENTATION USING DESIGN EPISODES, EXPLANATION TAGS, AND CONSTRAINTS

8Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The process of designing a building involves producing design concepts while fulfilling various requirements and regulations. Furthermore, during the project's life-cycle, multiple experts from multiple domains collaborate in developing the different partial models, including architectural, structural, and HVAC among others. Accordingly, clearly communicating the rationale behind design decisions is crucial for developing regulatory compliant designs that also fit the owner’s needs. The developed designs are the main deliverables exchanged and handed over. However, these deliverables do not include any explanation of design intentions or documentation of design decisions. Communication among parties and reuse of knowledge are hindered by the absent explanation of existing design. To overcome this deficiency, this paper proposes a methodology for digitally documenting design decisions, incorporating their intention and rationale. Architectural concepts and evaluation criteria are represented in the form of explanation tags as well as spatial and semantic constraints, which are assigned to the individual model elements and properties. Additionally, to document how design decisions fulfill owner requirements and regulatory documents, natural language processing (NLP) is employed to facilitate querying those documents and then the individual requirements are linked to specific elements, properties, and constraints. To evaluate the proposed methodology, a prototype was implemented as a plugin inside a BIM-Authoring tool and multiple real-world use cases are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zahedi, A., Abualdenien, J., Petzold, F., & Borrmann, A. (2022). BIM-BASED DESIGN DECISIONS DOCUMENTATION USING DESIGN EPISODES, EXPLANATION TAGS, AND CONSTRAINTS. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 27, 756–780. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2022.037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free