Association of Volume With Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Scheduled vs Nonscheduled Operations

276Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Empirical evidence suggests that mortality rates for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery are lower in hospitals that perform a higher volume of the procedure. In recent years, the criteria for CABG surgery have been expanded to include patients with a wide variety of co-morbidities. To address the question of whether the volume-outcome relationship continues to exist for this new group of patients, discharge abstracts for 18986 CABG operations at 77 hospitals in California in 1983 were analyzed using multiple-regression techniques. Higher-volume hospitals had lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted for case mix); this effect was greatest in patients who might be characterized as having “non-scheduled” CABG surgery. Higher-volume hospitals also had shorter average postoperative lengths of stay and fewer patients with extremely long stays. The results of this study suggest that the greatest improvement in average outcomes for CABG surgery would result from the closure of low-volume surgery units. © 1987, American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Showstack, J. A., Rosenfeld, K. E., Garnick, D. W., Luft, H. S., Schaffarzick, R. W., & Fowles, J. (1987). Association of Volume With Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Scheduled vs Nonscheduled Operations. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 257(6), 785–789. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1987.03390060075027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free