Cervical cytology: Are national guidelines adequate for women attending genitourinary medicine clinics?

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To study whether all women attending a genitourinary medicine (GUM) Clinic warrant a cervical smear as part of a routine screen for infection, or whether this 'at risk' population is adequately covered by the national screening programme. Methods: A cervical smear and a screen for sexually transmitted infections (STI) were taken from 900 women attending a GUM clinic between May 1996 and April 1997. Results: Of 812 smears available for analysis, 613 (75.5%) were normal, 176 (21.7%) were mildly abnormal, and 23 (2.8%) were moderately or severely abnormal. In the absence of an STI there was a 14% (37/273) risk of having an abnormal cervical smear. In the presence of cervicitis the risk was 26% (22/84) and with genital warts the risk was 34% (75/215). Conclusion: The national screening programme guidelines for cervical cytology should be followed in the GUM clinic. There is no benefit in performing extra smears outside the programme nor in adopting a policy of universal screening.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foley, E., & Harindra, V. (1999). Cervical cytology: Are national guidelines adequate for women attending genitourinary medicine clinics? Sexually Transmitted Infections, 75(5), 349–351. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.75.5.349

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free