An assessment of DSS design science using the Hevner, March, Park and Ram guidelines

1Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Design science has been an important strategy in decision support systems (DSS) research since the inception of the field in the early 1970s. Recent reviews of DSS research have indicated a need to improve its quality and relevance. DSS design science has an important role in this improvement as design science can engage industry and the profession in intellectually important projects. The 2004 publication of the Hevner, March, Park and Ram (HMPR) guidelines for the conduct and assessment of information systems design science provides a vehicle for assessing DSS design science. This chapter presents research that uses bibliometric content analysis to apply the HMPR guidelines to a representative sample of DSS design-science papers in 14 journals. The analysis highlights issues that need attention-notably, evaluation, research design, strategic focus and theorising. Comments are also offered on the experience of applying the HMPR guidelines to a large body of research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arnott, D., & Pervan, G. (2010). An assessment of DSS design science using the Hevner, March, Park and Ram guidelines. In Information Systems Foundations: The Role of Design Science (pp. 255–284). ANU E Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/isf.12.2010.12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free