Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with conventional and 3D printed provisional materials

18Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate, through microcomputed tomography (μCT), the cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with different provisional materials. Material and Methods: A veneer and a crown preparation were performed on a central incisor and a second molar of a dental model, respectively, scanned with an intraoral scanner, and the.stl files were exported to an LCD-based SLA three-dimensional (3D)-Printer. Twenty-four preparations were 3D-printed for each veneer and crown and divided into four groups (n = 6/group): (a) Acrylic resin (Acrílico Marche); (b) Bisacrylic resin (Protemp 4); (c) PMMA computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) (Vipiblock); and (d) 3D-printed resin for provisional restorations (Raydent C&B for temporary crown and bridge). Veneers and crowns restorations were performed and cemented with a flowable composite. Each specimen was scanned with a μCT apparatus, files were imported for data analysis, and cement film thickness was quantitatively measured. Data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests (α =.05). Results: Crowns presented a thicker cementation film than veneers (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sampaio, C. S., Niemann, K. D., Schweitzer, D. D., Hirata, R., & Atria, P. J. (2021). Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with conventional and 3D printed provisional materials. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 33(3), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12651

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free