Contemporary Discourses of Green Political Economy: A Q Method Analysis

52Citations
Citations of this article
186Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For over two decades, the concept of sustainable development has been salient in political discourse. But its promise of reconciling economic development, social welfare, and environmental sustainability has proven rather elusive. In recent years, we've seen numerous competing concepts emerge in debates about sustainable economic development. While many advance ideas of a green economy and green growth, others talk about wellbeing, gross national happiness, inclusive wealth, harmony with nature, de-growth, steady-state economy, and buenvivir (living well). This rhetorical diversity shows that there is no single vision for reconciling environmental sustainability and economic development. But the varied terminology itself obscures actual points of agreement and disagreement. This article reports on a bilingual ‘Q study’ of international debates about sustainable economic development. It reveals that three discourses underpin these debates: Radical Transformationism; Cooperative Reformism; and Statist Progressivism. The article dissects these discourses and contextualizes their key points of contention in wider sustainability debates over the past two decades.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stevenson, H. (2019). Contemporary Discourses of Green Political Economy: A Q Method Analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 21(5), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1118681

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free