Implementing Differentiated Instruction in Writing Procedure Text for Grade X Students (Phase E) at SMA N 1 Wonosari, Indonesia

  • Sari F
  • Lihawa K
  • Pakaya U
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research aims to know any difference of students’ ability in writing procedure text who were taught through implementation differentiation instruction and conventional teaching. Employing a mixed-method approach, this research focuses on 128 students of SMA Negeri 1 Wonosari, Boalemo Regency, Gorontalo Province as research population and 32 students of class X B, as the experimental class and X C, as the control class, respectively, as research samples. Data collection involves two methods, which are PASL survey to obtain students’ interests and learning styles, as well as an essay test. As a means of assessing the effect of the treatment on students writing, a scoring rubric proposed by Brown (2007) is utilized. Data analysis involves a statistical analysis, specifically t-test, followed by the experimental data analysis with the pre-test and post-test models. Based on the findings, the result of calculation showed the value of Tcount as 5.53 and the value of Table is 1.822. Therefore, since Tcount >Ttable, H0 is rejected, which implies that there is statistical evidence to support the presence of a significant difference in students' writing ability through the implementation of differentiated instruction. In summary, the research suggests that differentiated instruction has a positive impact on students' writing ability compared to conventional teaching methods, based on the statistical analysis and the rejection of the null hypothesis. Keywords: writing ability, differentiated instruction, mixed-method approach

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sari, F., Lihawa, K., & Pakaya, U. (2023). Implementing Differentiated Instruction in Writing Procedure Text for Grade X Students (Phase E) at SMA N 1 Wonosari, Indonesia. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(7), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230725

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free