The Conflict Between Different Forms of Rationality

0Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to demonstrate that Husserl’s grand picture of the history of Western philosophy, notably modern philosophy, is to be understood as determined by a conflict between the two forms of rationality so far distinguished in the book. In particular, we will explain that starting with Descartes, the history of philosophy is characterized by a conflict or even a struggle between different ways of conceiving of the ontological form of rationality and its relation to the transcendental reason, and that Husserl is firmly convinced that only his phenomenology could provide an actual reconciliation between them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Santis, D. (2021). The Conflict Between Different Forms of Rationality. In Contributions To Phenomenology (Vol. 114, pp. 247–267). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69528-6_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free