5 km front crawl in pool and open water swimming: breath-by-breath energy expenditure and kinematic analysis

17Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Breath-by-breath energy expenditure during open water swimming has not yet been explored in an ecological environment. This study aimed to investigate and compare energetics and kinematics of 5 km swimming, in both swimming pool and open water conditions. Methods: Through four independent studies, oxygen uptake (V˙ O 2) kinetics, heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration ([La−]) and glucose level (BGL), metabolic power (E˙ ), energy cost (C) and kinematics were assessed during 5 km front crawl trials in a swimming pool and open water conditions. A total of 38 competitive open water swimmers aged 16–27 years volunteered for this four part investigation: Study A (pool, ten females, 11 males), Study B (pool, four females, six males), Study C (pool case study, one female) and Study D (open water, three females, four males). Results: In the swimming pool, swimmers started with an above average swimming speed (v), losing efficiency along the 5 km, despite apparent homeostasis for [La−], BGL, V˙ O 2, E˙ and C. In open water, swimmers started the 5 km with a below average v, increasing the stroke rate (SR) in the last 1000 m. In open water, V˙ O 2 kinetics parameters, HR, [La−], BGL, respiratory exchange ratio and C were affected by the v and SR fluctuations along the 5 km. Conclusions: Small fluctuations were observed for energetic variables in both conditions, but changes in C were lower in swimming pool than in open water. Coaches should adjust the training plan accordingly to the specificity of open water swimming.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zacca, R., Neves, V., da Silva Oliveira, T., Soares, S., Rama, L. M. P. L., de Souza Castro, F. A., … Fernandes, R. J. (2020). 5 km front crawl in pool and open water swimming: breath-by-breath energy expenditure and kinematic analysis. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 120(9), 2005–2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04420-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free