Myths, mystique, and misconceptions of venous disease

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

I have addressed a number of myths and misconceptions of venous disease, but there are many left to be discussed. There are not many randomized trials available from which to draw definitive conclusions. Many basic and clinical investigations lack the scientific rigor to allow firm conclusions; yet, the information can be enormously valuable. By objectively evaluating existing data and using available information integrated with known physiologic and pathophysiologic mechanisms, myths and misconceptions will disappear and understanding will be clarified. It is evident that "venous disease" encompasses many specialties, at both the basic science and clinical levels, which may contribute to the mystique of venous disease. Although the disciplines involved may be diverse, the principles underlying the management of venous disease remain simple.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Comerota, A. J. (2001). Myths, mystique, and misconceptions of venous disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 34(5), 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2001.116099

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free