Powder, Pomp, Power: Toward a Typology and Genealogy of Effeminacies

  • Hennen P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An analysis of some of the varying historical and cross-cultural meanings of effeminacy and their relationship to hegemonic masculinity provides a unique perspective on the social construction of the sex/gender system currently operating in most industrialized societies of the West. In this paper I present a brief review of the historical uses of effeminacy in Europe and the US and develop a five point typology. My survey reveals a plethora of meanings, linking effeminacy alternately with deficient citizenship, a general lack of sexual restraint, excessive heterosexual behavior, exclusive connection with passive homosexual activity, and finally as an incorrigible proposition that utilizes a naturalistic narrative to link it with homosexual orientation regardless of sexual role. I then employ the typology introduced here to expand and augment an argument advanced by Randolph Trumbach to explain the emergence of the strong cultural link between effeminacy and homosexuality during the 18th century.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hennen, P. (2014). Powder, Pomp, Power: Toward a Typology and Genealogy of Effeminacies. Social Thought and Research. https://doi.org/10.17161/str.1808.5177

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free