Comparison of working length determination using apex locator, conventional radiography and radiovisiography: an in vitro study.

6Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the working length determination done using three methods, namely, apex locator (Foramatron D-10, Parkell), radiovisiography (Planmeca) and conventional radiography (Prostyle intra, Planmeca). In this experiment, to determine the working length, 35 single-rooted teeth were selected and each tooth was subjected to all the three methods of the working length determination. This was compared with the actual working length measured utilizing ground sections of the individual teeth. The results revealed that all the three methods located the apex nearly as accurately as the actual root canal length obtained by histological ground sectioning, and among three methods apex locator being the closest to the actual root canal length. The study concludes that all the three techniques are equally effective in determining working length.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kishor, K. M. N. (2012). Comparison of working length determination using apex locator, conventional radiography and radiovisiography: an in vitro study. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 13(4), 550–553. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1184

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free