Abstract
Furlaud et al. (2026) discussed how to measure ‘ecosystem condition’. Here, we argue that the term ‘ecosystem valuation’ should be preferred. ‘Valuation’ signals clearly that a social or political value judgement is being made about which ecosystem states to rate most highly. Furlaud et al. interpreted condition as similarity to a preindustrial or reference state. However, many different criteria have been proposed for valuing different ecosystem states. The word condition risks giving the impression that ecosystem science has arrived objectively at a single criterion. We recommend also that particular criteria for valuation should be named in a way that summarizes what they actually are: for example, conservation of endangered species, pastoral value, carbon storage or similarity to preindustrial.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Westoby, M., Coleman, D., Eldridge, D. J., Kooyman, R. M., Kotowska, M., Mallen-Cooper, M., … Watson, I. W. (2026). Ecosystem valuation: Concept, criteria and terminology. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 17(5), 1480–1484. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70279
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.