Comparative Evaluation of Biofilm Adhesion to Different Types of Archwire and Microbiological Colonization During Orthodontic Treatment

  • Polke P
  • Jain U
  • Marothiya S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective:To evaluate the biofilm adhesion to 4 types of ?as retrieved? archwires during orthodontic treatment. To compare biofilm formation by viable cell counting (colony-forming units [CFU]) of microbes (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans).Methods:The study was conducted on 40 patients who were divided into 4 equal groups based on the type of archwire of same cross-section (0.019" ? 0.025"): group 1?copper-nickel titanium (Cu-NiTi); group 2?titanium molybdenum alloy (TMA); group 3?stainless steel (SS); and group 4?aesthetic coated SS. After 1 month of fixed orthodontic therapy, the archwires were removed carefully from the oral cavity.Results:Biofilm absorbance and biofilm concentration were significant (P ≤ .05) in all the 4 groups.Conclusion:The group 2 wire showed the maximum affinity for biofilm absorbance and biofilm concentration, whereas the group 4 wire showed the least affinity. The group 4 wire promoted less retention of oral bacteria compared with the wires of the other groups, whereas the group 1 wire showed maximum retention. In the present study, all types of wire showed maximum affinity for S mutans and the least affinity for C albicans, except for the group 1 wire, which showed maximum affinity for S aureus. Biofilm adhesion could be a significant determining factor in the selection of orthodontic archwire for patients primarily at risk of dental caries or periodontal diseases, or both.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Polke, P., Jain, U., Marothiya, S., Agrawal, P., Dixit, S., & Dubey, C. (2021). Comparative Evaluation of Biofilm Adhesion to Different Types of Archwire and Microbiological Colonization During Orthodontic Treatment. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 55(2), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301574220957794

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free