Why quality-of-life data collection and use should be standardized when evaluating candidates for hand transplantation

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article argues for 3 mutually reinforcing interventions in the field of hand transplantation (HTx): (1) collection of qualitative data about hand transplant recipients' subjective quality of life (QoL) outcomes, (2) multicenter standardization of data collection, and (3) use of data to develop evidence-based, standardized protocols for HTx candidate evaluation and information disclosure. These interventions are needed to improve candidate evaluation and informed consent processes in HTx, wherein the highly personal nature of desired outcomes justifies holding a candidate's consent to a standard approaching authenticity rather than the usual minimal standard of being informed and voluntary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kumnig, M., Massey, E. K., & Parker, L. S. (2019). Why quality-of-life data collection and use should be standardized when evaluating candidates for hand transplantation. AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.974

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free