Clinicopathologic and outcome features of superficial high-grade and deep low-grade squamous cell carcinomas of the penis

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To report the clinicopathologic and outcome features of superficial high-grade and deep low-grade penile squamous cell carcinomas. Methods: From a retrospectively-collected series of patients with penile cancer we identified 41 cases corresponding to 12 superficial high-grade tumors and 29 deep low-grade tumors. As outcomes we evaluated inguinal lymph node status, presence of tumor relapse, final nodal status, and cancer-specific death. Follow-up ranged from 0.8 to 386.7 months (mean 152.5 months, median 157.3 months). Results: Clinicopathologic features were similar between superficial high-grade and deep low-grade tumors, except for a tendency (Fisher’s exact $$P=0.057$$P=0.057) of the former to include tumors with a verruciform pattern of growth. A significantly higher proportion of inguinal lymph node metastasis was found in superficial high-grade tumors compared to deep low-grade tumors [4/5 (80%) vs. 1/5 (20%) respectively, Fisher’s exact $$P=0.02$$P=0.02]. No significant differences were found regarding tumor relapse (Fisher’s exact $$P=0.52$$P=0.52), final nodal status (Mantel-Cox’s $$P=0.42$$P=0.42), or cancer-related death (Mantel-Cox’s $$P=0.52$$P=0.52). Conclusions: Patients with superficial high-grade tumors had a significantly higher proportion of inguinal lymph node metastasis compared to patients with deep low-grade tumors. On this regard, prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy might be indicated in cases of superficial tumors with high-grade histology while in deeply invasive low-grade penile carcinomas a more conservative approach may be considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaux, A. (2015). Clinicopathologic and outcome features of superficial high-grade and deep low-grade squamous cell carcinomas of the penis. SpringerPlus, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1035-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free