Abstract
There are ∼40,000 new rectal cancer cases diagnosed each year in the United States, representing the second most common gastrointestinal malignancy (behind colon cancer). With the advent of sphincter preserving techniques, patients with mid and low colorectal cancers enjoy the benefits of better postoperative functional outcomes and quality of life; however, controversy exists over which reconstructive technique is superior in restoring bowel continuity. Construction of a straight coloanal anastomosis is technically simpler, but functional outcomes are inferior compared with colonic reservoirs. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current data regarding reconstructive techniques following proctectomy. Copyright © 2007 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
De La Fuente, S. G., & Mantyh, C. R. (2007, August). Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: What’s the best? Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-984866
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.