Aspirational and aversive constitutionalism: The case for studying cross-constitutional influence through negative models

  • Scheppele K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BORROW—1. trans. a. To take (a thing) on pledge or security given for its safe return; b. To take (a thing) on credit, on the understanding of returning it, or giving an equivalent; hence, to obtain or take the temporary use of (a thing recognized as being the property of another, to whom it is returnable)… 2.fig.a.….More usually of immaterial things: as, to adopt (thoughts, expressions, modes of conduct) from another person, or (words, idioms, customs, etc.) from a foreign language or people; to obtain (a temporary favour) by request; to derive (one's authority, etc.) from another, as opposed to holding it by inherent right; to draw (a comparison, inference, suggestion) from some source alien to the subject in hand; to adopt (something) for other than its normal purpose…. Oxford English Dictionary, 2d ed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scheppele, K. L. (2003). Aspirational and aversive constitutionalism: The case for studying cross-constitutional influence through negative models. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(2), 296–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/1.2.296

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free