Double antithrombotic therapy for prevention of bleeding and ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background:The efficacy of double antithrombotic therapy (DAT) vs. triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) for prevention of bleeding and ischemic events in patients with atrial fibrillation following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear in those subgroups defined by the 5 factors (i.e., sex, age, race, history of diabetes, and type of P2Y12 inhibitor). We aimed to assess the efficacy of DAT vs TAT in these patient subgroups.Methods:We searched PubMed and relevant websites to include related randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two endpoints of interest were clinically significant bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Meta-analysis was performed stratified by 5 factors of interest (i.e., sex, age, race, history of diabetes, and type of P2Y12 inhibitor) to obtain pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-regression analysis was conducted to evaluate subgroup effects. We detected publication bias by Egger test and funnel plots.Results:We included 4 RCTs for meta-analysis. DAT vs TAT significantly reduced the risk of clinically significant bleeding (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.50-0.63). This effect of DAT was observed in most subgroups of interest (HR ranged from 0.54 to 0.69), and was consistent across various subgroups defined by each of the 5 factors of interest (Psubgroupranged from 0.290 to 0.794). DAT vs TAT led to the similar risk of MACE (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.89-1.08). This effect of DAT was observed in all subgroups of interest (all 95% CIs of HRs were across 1.0), and was consistent across various subgroups defined by each of the 5 factors of interest (Psubgroupranged from 0.308 to 0.828). Publication bias was found only in one subgroup.Conclusions:Compared with TAT, DAT significantly reduces the risk of clinically significant bleeding and leads to the similar risk of MACE in patients with atrial fibrillation following PCI, irrespective of sex, age, race, history of diabetes, and type of P2Y12 inhibitor used at baseline.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qiu, M., Liu, S. Y., & Zhou, H. R. (2021, January 8). Double antithrombotic therapy for prevention of bleeding and ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024188

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free