Ascorbate in the guinea pig lens: Dependence on drinking water supplementation

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether lens ascorbate concentration can be elevated with drinking water supplementation. Methods: Pigmented guinea pigs received drinking water supplemented with L-ascorbate, concentration 0.00, 2.84, 5.68 or 8.52 mM for a duration of 4 weeks. In addition, the chow fed to all animals contained 125 mmol L-ascorbate per kg of chow. At the end of the supplementation period, the guinea pigs were killed. Each lens was extracted. The lens was processed and ascorbate concentration was measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with 254 nm ultraviolet radiation detection. The data were analysed with regression. Results: At the end of the test period, all lenses were devoid of cataract as observed by slit-lamp examination. All lenses contained a detectable concentration of ascorbate. Estimated 95% confidence intervals for mean animal-averaged lens ascorbate concentrations (μmol/g wet weight of whole lens) per group were 0.51 ± 0.04 (0.00 mM; n = 6), 0.70 ± 0.18 (2.84 mM; n = 6), 0.71 ± 0.11 (5.68 mM; n = 5), and 0.71 ± 0.06 (8.52 mM; n = 6). Animal-averaged lens ascorbate concentration [Asclens] (μmol/g wet weight lens) increased with ascorbate supplementation in drinking water [Ascwater] (M), in agreement with the model: [Asclens] = A - Be -kAscwater Conclusion: Lens ascorbate concentration increases with drinking water supplementation in the guinea pig without cataract development. The currently presented method for measurement of whole tens ascorbate content is suitable. Copyright © Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mody, V. C., Kakar, M., Elfving, Å., Söderberg, P. G., & Löfgren, S. (2005). Ascorbate in the guinea pig lens: Dependence on drinking water supplementation. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 83(2), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00416.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free