The quadriplegia index of function (QIF): Sensitivity and reliability demonstrated in a study of thirty quadriplegic patients

109Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF) was originally developed by the authors in 1980 because the popular Barthel Index was deemed too insensitive to document the small but significant functional gains made by quadriplegics (tetraplegics) during medical rehabilitation. The QIF has now been tested on a group of 30 complete quadriplegic patients at admission to and discharge from inpatient medical rehabilita- tion. Resultant scores were compared to those simultaneously obtained by the Barthel Index and the Kenny Self-Care Evaluation. The QIF was found to be more sensitive (46 per cent improvement as opposed to 30 per cent by the Kenny Self Care Evaluation and 20 per cent by the Barthel Index). The QIF was also tested for reliability. Ratings by three different nurses, working independently, were found to be significantly positively correlated for all sub-scores (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gresham, G. E., Labi, M. L. C., Dittmar, S. S., Hicks, J. T., Joyce, S. Z., & Stehlik, M. A. P. (1986). The quadriplegia index of function (QIF): Sensitivity and reliability demonstrated in a study of thirty quadriplegic patients. Paraplegia, 24(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1986.7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free