What explains vast differences in jumping power within a clade? Diversity, ecology and evolution of anuran jumping power

19Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Anuran (frog and toad) jumping power varies greatly across species, yet muscle power does not. Given that the jumping power of some species is up to five times higher than typical muscle power, power amplification by elastic elements is suggested to explain this discrepancy. However, the ecological reasons for this variation in jumping power remain unclear. One hypothesis is that small jumpers are limited by the time available to accelerate their body during take-off, leading to small species needing greater power production than larger species to achieve similar jumping performance. Another (non-mutually exclusive) hypothesis is that the microhabitat species inhabit may drive variation through trade-offs with performance in microhabitat-specific, non-jumping behaviours. We compared jumping power across 68 anuran species that were diverse in evolutionary relationships, microhabitat use and body mass. We used phylogenetic comparative methods to compare the role of microhabitat and body mass in explaining variation in jumping power across species. We found the strongest support for a model that included two factors and their interaction. First, as body mass increased, jumping power decreased. Second, species that burrowed showed lower jumping power than species that did not burrow. Third, the interaction between body mass and burrowing behaviour showed that jumping power declines more rapidly with body mass in burrowing species than non-burrowing species. The effect of body mass suggests that interspecific variation in jumping power might be partly explained by scaling relationships. Anurans with small body mass may be able to achieve similar locomotor performance (e.g. takeoff velocity) as those with larger body mass, by more effectively amplifying muscle power. Additionally, the effect of burrowing behaviour suggests that species that use hindlimbs to burrow may experience a reduction in their ability to generate jumping power. This may indicate a functional trade-off between jumping and burrowing performance. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mendoza, E., Azizi, E., & Moen, D. S. (2020). What explains vast differences in jumping power within a clade? Diversity, ecology and evolution of anuran jumping power. Functional Ecology, 34(5), 1053–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13545

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free