Gastroesophageal reflux prophylaxis decreases the incidence of pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy

54Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pharyngocutaneous fistula is a serious complication after laryngectomy. Gastric fluid is known to cause severe laryngopharyngeal injury and poor mucosal healing. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of a gastroesophageal reflux prophylaxis regimen on the incidence of fistula after laryngectomy. Twenty-one consecutive patients were entered in the study. Patients with positive resection margins were excluded from the overall analysis. All patients had a Connell’s two-layer closure of the pharynx with absorbable suture, suction drainage of the neck, postoperative tube feeding, and prophylactic antibiotics. All patients were started on an antireflux regimen postoperatively composed of continuous tube feeds, intravenous ranitidine, and intravenous metoclopramide hydrochloride. Patients were followed postoperatively with Gastrografin swallows and clinically for 8 weeks. The control group consisted of retrospectively studied patients managed identically except for the antireflux prophylaxis. The two groups were well matched for factors reported to influence the rate of pharyngocutaneous fistula formation. The control group had six fistulae (26%) and an average of 16.5 days of hospital stay. The study group had no fistulae and an average of 11.5 days of hospital stay (P =.02). This study suggests that gastroesophageal reflux may predispose to fistula formation after laryngectomy and that mechanical and pharmacological prophy-laxsis decreases postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay. © The American Laryngological, Rhinological & Otological Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seikaly, H., & Park, P. (1995). Gastroesophageal reflux prophylaxis decreases the incidence of pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope, 105(11), 1220–1222. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199511000-00015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free