The venetian-blind effect: A preference for zero disparity or zero slant?

4Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When periodic stimuli such as vertical sinewave gratings are presented to the two eyes, the initial stage of disparity estimation yields multiple solutions at multiple depths. The solutions are all frontoparallel when the sinewaves have the same spatial frequency; they are all slanted when the sinewaves have quite different frequencies. Despite multiple solutions, humans perceive only one depth in each visual direction: a single frontoparallel plane when the frequencies are the same and a series of small slanted planes-Venetian blinds-when the frequencies are quite different. These percepts are consistent with a preference for solutions that minimize absolute disparity or overall slant. The preference for minimum disparity and minimum slant are identical for gaze at zero eccentricity; we dissociated the predictions of the two by measuring the occurrence of Venetian blinds when the stimuli were viewed in eccentric gaze. The results were generally quite consistent with a zero-disparity preference (Experiment 1), but we also observed a shift toward a zero-slant preference when the edges of the stimulus had zero slant (Experiment 2). These observations provide useful insights into how the visual system constructs depth percepts from a multitude of possible depths. © 2013 Vlaskamp, Guan and Banks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vlaskamp, B. N. S., Guan, P., & Banks, M. S. (2013). The venetian-blind effect: A preference for zero disparity or zero slant? Frontiers in Psychology, 4(NOV). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00836

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free