Revaluation harmonization: Digging the solution of traditional and modern market conflicts in Surakarta

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose of Study: The research aims to determine: 1) the policy implementation of legal protection of traditional markets in Surakarta, and 2) The causes of conflict between traditional markets and modern markets in Surakarta. Methodology: The research used the sociological juridical approach with traditional markets in Surakarta as the study population. The sampling technique was purposive sampling by classifying the market class with sub-populations based on the homogeneous typology. Results: The results of this research were: (1) the implementation of legal protection of traditional markets in Surakarta included the preventive, repressive, and functional legal protection, (2) the causes of conflict between the modern and traditional markets in Surakarta examined from juridical normative and sociology. The conflict can be solved by preventive and repressive legal protection. Implications/Applications: The efforts to prevent conflict in the traditional markets are in the form of regulatory and implementation. Therefore, the enforcement and legal protection model of traditional markets in Surakarta can be implemented properly.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harun, Yuspin, W., & Handoyo. (2019). Revaluation harmonization: Digging the solution of traditional and modern market conflicts in Surakarta. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(3), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7322

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free