FASB to Practitioners: 'Substance over Form' for Me but Not for Thee - An Apologia

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This an apologia to Williams, P. F. (2022). The decline of substance over form in accounting: A problematic dichotomy. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium critique of Fischer, D., Ellman, O., & Schochet, S. (2021). The decline of substance over form in accounting. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 20190052 article about the decline of substance over form in accounting. The concept of "substance over form"has traditionally been a guiding principle for practicing accountants. In recent years, FASB has taken away the prerogative from individual practitioners to organically evolved GAAP. In the pre-FASB era, GAAP was indeed a bottom-up generally-accepted framework. Nowadays, FASB appropriates to itself the privilege to decide when form conforms with economic substance and when form should be bent to correspond to accounting theory.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fischer, D. (2023). FASB to Practitioners: “Substance over Form” for Me but Not for Thee - An Apologia. Accounting, Economics and Law: A Convivium, 13(3), 403–406. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2022-0046

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free