Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: Implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism

148Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

One evolutionary pathway from plants with combined male and female functions (hermaphroditism) to those with separate sexes (dioecy) involves females coexisting with hermaphrodites (gynodioecy). The research presented here explores sex allocation in Fragaria virginiana (a gynodioecious wild strawberry), within the context of theory on the gynodioecy-dioecy transition. By growing clonally replicated plants in the greenhouse and surveying six populations in situ, I evaluated the effects of plant size, genotype, sexual identity, population of origin and female frequency on sex allocation. I found significant positive effects of plant size on most sex allocation traits studied. In addition to strong sex-specific allocation patterns, I found significant broadsense heritabilities for all traits, suggesting that plants could respond to selection. Moreover, there was a negative genetic correlation between pollen production and fruit set per flower within hermaphrodites, lending support to a basic assumption of sex allocation theory. On the other hand, several sex allocation traits, namely pollen and ovules per flower in hermaphrodites, were positively genetically correlated, suggesting that they may act to constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Populations differed in the frequency of females, and females were more prevalent on sites with lower soil moisture and where hermaphrodites were least likely to produce fruit, suggesting that females' seed fitness relative to that of hermaphrodites may be strongly environment-dependent in this species.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ashman, T. L. (1999). Determinants of sex allocation in a gynodioecious wild strawberry: Implications for the evolution of dioecy and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12(4), 648–661. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00059.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free