Background Controversy exists regarding the superiority of single photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT over SPECT for preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), as well as the cost-effectiveness. Methods A retrospective review was undertaken of patients undergoing surgery for PHPT from January 2009 to August 2014. Ultrasound and SPECT (ultrasound-SPECT) or SPECT/CT (ultrasound-SPECT/CT) were performed for each patient. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of each modality were calculated. Cost-effectiveness was determined by an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) analysis. Results Two hundred fifty-nine patients with 266 parathyroid adenomas were included in the study. Lateralization sensitivity and PPV of ultrasound-SPECT were 85.1% and 98.2%, respectively. The lateralization sensitivity and PPV of ultrasound-SPECT/CT were 86.9% and 99.4%, respectively. A cost of 2499.22 (CAD) per additional parathyroid adenoma detection by ultrasound-SPECT/CT was determined from the ICER analysis. Conclusion Similar sensitivities and PPVs were observed between ultrasound-SPECT and ultrasound-SPECT/CT in preoperatively lateralizing parathyroid adenomas, with relatively equivalent cost-effectiveness.
CITATION STYLE
Barber, B., Moher, C., Côté, D., Fung, E., O’Connell, D., Dziegielewski, P., & Harris, J. (2016). Comparison of single photon emission CT (SPECT) with SPECT/CT imaging in preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas: A cost-effectiveness analysis. In Head and Neck (Vol. 38, pp. E2062–E2065). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24379
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.