Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) polymorphisms are associated with reversal reaction in leprosy

119Citations
Citations of this article
120Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Leprosy is characterized by a spectrum of clinical manifestations that depend on the type of immune response against the pathogen. Patients may undergo immunological changes known as "reactional states" (reversal reaction and erythema nodosum leprosum) that result in major clinical deterioration. The goal of the present study was to assess the effect of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) polymorphisms on susceptibility to and clinical presentation of leprosy. Methods. Three polymorphisms in TLR2 (597C→T, 1350T→C, and a microsatellite marker) were analyzed in 431 Ethiopian patients with leprosy and 187 control subjects. The polymorphism-associated risk of developing leprosy, lepromatous (vs. tuberculoid) leprosy, and leprosy reactions was assessed by multivariate logistic regression models. Results. The microsatellite and the 597C→T polymorphisms both influenced susceptibility to reversal reaction. Although the 597T allele had a protective effect (odds ratio [OR], 0.34 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.17- 0.68]; P = .002 under the dominant model), homozygosity for the 280-bp allelic length of the microsatellite strongly increased the risk of reversal reaction (OR, 5.83 [95% CI, 1.98 -17.15]; P = .001 under the recessive model). These associations were consistent among 3 different ethnic groups. Conclusions. These data suggest a significant role for TLR-2 in the occurrence of leprosy reversal reaction and provide new insights into the immunogenetics of the disease. © 2008 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bochud, P. Y., Hawn, T. R., Siddiqui, M. R., Saunderson, P., Britton, S., Abraham, I., … Aderem, A. (2008). Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) polymorphisms are associated with reversal reaction in leprosy. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 197(2), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1086/524688

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free