Seeking racial and ethnic equity among neonatologists

7Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Racial and ethnic inequities in leadership achievement, compensation, scholarly productivity, and grant funding exists among physicians. This study explores whether similar inequities exist among neonatologists within the United States. Study design: A voluntary anonymous survey was distributed to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal–Perinatal Medicine with 560 respondents. Logistic regression and ordinary least squares were used to assess whether racial and ethnic identity is associated with clinical time, leadership, compensation, publication, grant funding, or academic rank. Results: As compared to non-Hispanic White neonatologists, statistical differences were found for underrepresented minorities in medicine in: regions of the country where they worked, total cash compensation received, being awarded an NIH grant, and location of graduate medical education. Fewer differences were found for Asian neonatologists and included location of graduate medicine education. Conclusion: Racial and ethnic identity remains a significant independent factor influencing professional achievement and compensation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horowitz, E., Samnaliev, M., & Savich, R. (2021). Seeking racial and ethnic equity among neonatologists. Journal of Perinatology, 41(3), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-00915-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free