Critique of Research Methodologies and Methods in Educational Leadership

  • Siddiqua A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this exploratory study was to document aspects of research methodology in educational leadership directed at emerging school leaders and the academic community that supports them. The intricacy of educational challenges highlights the necessity for a thorough investigation, the results of which will inform suitable reforms. Scholars have long argued about which of the qualitative and quantitative approaches is more rigorous in its contribution to the development of education. Some academics contend that since education focuses primarily on human behaviour, which is value-laden, research in this area should take a qualitative approach. Results indicate that while qualitative methods were more common in the arts, quantitative methods dominated research in education and the sciences. However, the social sciences frequently used a blend of qualitative and mixed approaches. The findings' implications for improving research methodology skills and the integrity of educational research are examined.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siddiqua, A. (2023). Critique of Research Methodologies and Methods in Educational Leadership. World Journal of Education, 13(4), 16. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v13n4p16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free