Not all price endings are created equal: Price points and asymmetric price rigidity

22Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We document an asymmetry in the rigidity of 9-ending prices relative to non-9-ending prices. Consumers have difficulty noticing higher prices if they are 9-ending, or noticing price-increases if the new prices are 9-ending, because 9-endings are used as a signal for low prices. Price setters respond strategically to the consumer-heuristic by setting 9-ending prices more often after price-increases than after price-decreases. 9-ending prices, therefore, remain 9-ending more often after price-increases than after price-decreases, leading to asymmetric rigidity: 9-ending prices are more rigid upward than downward. These findings hold for both transaction-prices and regular-prices, and for both inflation and no-inflation periods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levy, D., Snir, A., Gotler, A., & Chen, H. (Allan). (2020). Not all price endings are created equal: Price points and asymmetric price rigidity. Journal of Monetary Economics, 110, 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.01.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free