In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods

43Citations
Citations of this article
178Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Robust, efficient, and reproducible protein extraction and sample processing is a key step for bottom-up proteomics analyses. While many sample preparation protocols for mass spectrometry have been described, selecting an appropriate method remains challenging since some protein classes may require specialized solubilization, precipitation, and digestion procedures. Here, we present a comprehensive comparison of the 16 most widely used sample preparation methods, covering in-solution digests, device-based methods, and commercially available kits. We find a remarkably good performance of the majority of the protocols with high reproducibility, little method dependency, and low levels of artifact formation. However, we revealed method-dependent differences in the recovery of specific protein features, which we summarized in a descriptive guide matrix. Our work thereby provides a solid basis for the selection of MS sample preparation strategies for a given proteomics project.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varnavides, G., Madern, M., Anrather, D., Hartl, N., Reiter, W., & Hartl, M. (2022). In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods. Journal of Proteome Research, 21(10), 2397–2411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00265

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free