Forms of justice in Aeschylus' Eumenides

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, we explore the forms of justice presented in Aeschylus' Eumenides. Most scholarship hitherto has focused on the shift from retaliatory justice to trial by court of law enacted in the play. However, the verdict pronounced in Orestes' favor does not bring about resolution, but rather threatens to destabilize the polis, as the Furies redirect their anger against Athens. Indeed, the play can be seen as a study in the limitations of criminal justice. Our article examines the resolution of the conflict in the post-trial phase of the play in the light of principles and practices of modern restorative justice. Such comparison is not intended as arguing for correspondence. Rather, the aim is to understand more fully the dynamics of Athena's intervention by analyzing it against key elements of restorative justice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dugdale, E., & Gerstbauer, L. (2017). Forms of justice in Aeschylus’ Eumenides. Polis (United Kingdom), 34(2), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340125

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free