Comparing Inception V3, VGG 16, VGG 19, CNN, and ResNet 50: A Case Study on Early Detection of a Rice Disease

36Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Rice production has faced numerous challenges in recent years, and traditional methods are still being used to detect rice diseases. This research project developed an automated rice blast disease diagnosis technique based on deep learning, image processing, and transfer learning with pre-trained models such as Inception V3, VGG16, VGG19, and ResNet50. The public dataset consists of 2000 images; about 1200 images belong to the leaf blast class, and 800 to the healthy leaf class. The modified connection-skipping ResNet 50 had the highest accuracy of 99.75% with a loss rate of 0.33, while the other models achieved 98.16%, 98.47%, and 98.56%, respectively. Furthermore, ResNet 50 achieved a validation accuracy of 99.69%, precision of 99.50%, F1-score of 99.70, and AUC of 99.83%. In conclusion, the study demonstrated a superior performance and disease prediction using the Gradio web application.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shah, S. R., Qadri, S., Bibi, H., Shah, S. M. W., Sharif, M. I., & Marinello, F. (2023). Comparing Inception V3, VGG 16, VGG 19, CNN, and ResNet 50: A Case Study on Early Detection of a Rice Disease. Agronomy, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061633

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free