Management Influence on Investors: Evidence from Shareholder Votes on the Frequency of Say on Pay

31Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The literature on shareholder voting has mostly focused on the influence of proxy advisors on shareholder votes. We exploit a unique empirical setting enabling us to provide a direct estimate of management's influence. Analyzing shareholder votes on the frequency of future say on pay (SOP) votes, we find that a management recommendation for a particular frequency is associated with a 26 percent increase in voting support for that frequency. Additional tests suggest that the documented association is likely to capture a causal effect. Management influence varies across firms and is smaller at firms where perceived management credibility is lower. Compared to firms adopting an annual frequency, firms following management's recommendation to adopt a triennial frequency are significantly less likely to change their compensation practices in response to an adverse SOP vote, consistent with the notion that a less frequent vote results in lower management accountability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferri, F., & Oesch, D. (2016). Management Influence on Investors: Evidence from Shareholder Votes on the Frequency of Say on Pay. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), 1337–1374. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12228

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free