The prevalence, burden of disease, and healthcare utilization of patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis in Japan: a retrospective, descriptive cohort claims database study

24Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) prevalence and disease burden in patients with newly diagnosed EGPA in Japan. Methods: This retrospective descriptive cohort study (GSK ID: 209751, HO-18-19652) used administrative claim data from patients (aged ≤74 years) with EGPA (study period: January 1, 2005-December 31, 2017), identified from their first ICD-10 code for EGPA (index). Data were examined during the 12 months before (baseline) and 12 months following the index date (follow-up). EGPA prevalence, respiratory comorbidities, all-cause healthcare utilization, and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use were assessed. Results: EGPA prevalence (95%CI) increased from 4.2 (0,23.7)/million people (2005) to 38.0 (31.8,45.1)/million people (2017), was generally more common in females versus males, and increased with age. Of the 45 patients with newly diagnosed EGPA, 57.8% had acute bronchitis and 42.2% had upper respiratory tract infections during baseline. During follow-up, 60.0% of patients were hospitalized at least once and 77.8% used OCS (OCS dependent [≥80% of days]: 73.1%). Conclusions: In Japan, EGPA prevalence increased over time, was generally more common in females, and increased with patient age. EGPA burden was high; respiratory comorbidities were common, and most patients required hospitalization and OCS use. Our data suggest additional EGPA treatment options are needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sada, K. E., Kojo, Y., Fairburn-Beech, J., Sato, K., Akiyama, S., Van Dyke, M. K., & Mukai, I. (2022). The prevalence, burden of disease, and healthcare utilization of patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis in Japan: a retrospective, descriptive cohort claims database study. Modern Rheumatology, 32(2), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roab007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free