Evaluating the usability and security of a graphical onetime PIN system

26Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Traditional Personal Identification Numbers (PINs) are widely used, but the attacks in which they are captured have been increasing. One-time PINs offer better security, but potentially create greater workload for users. In this paper, we present an independent evaluation of a commercial system that makes PINs more resistant to observation attacks by using graphical passwords on a grid to generate a one-time PIN. 83 participants were asked to register with the system and log in at varying intervals. The successful login rate was approximately 91% after 3-4 days, and 97% after 9-10 days. Twenty five participants were retested after two years, and 27% of those were able to recall their pattern. We recorded 17 instances of failed attempts, and found that even though participants recalled the general shape of the pass-pattern in 13 of these instances, they could not recall its detailed location or sequence of cells. We conclude that GrIDsure is usable if people have one pass-pattern, but the level of security will depend on the context of use (it will work best in scenarios where repeated observations of transactions are unlikely), and the instructions given to users (without guidance, they are likely to chose from a small subset of the possible patterns which are easily guessed).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brostoff, S., Inglesant, P., & Sasse, M. A. (2010). Evaluating the usability and security of a graphical onetime PIN system. In Proceedings of the 2010 British Computer Society Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, BCS-HCI 2010. BCS Learning and Development Ltd. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2010.13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free