Challenging Menstrual Normativity: Nonessentialist Body Politics and Feminist Epistemologies of Health

8Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Guilló-Arakistain examines the ways in which alternative politics of menstruation are challenging the paradigm of sexual dimorphism and heteronormativity. She does this through consideration of discourses which challenge the ideology of menstrual normativity and the rigid, hegemonic, medical, and pathological approaches to the western biomedical vision of menstruation. Guilló-Arakistain links these discourses to specific bodies, incorporating experiences of non-menstruating cisgender women as well as transgender menstruators. It is necessary, she asserts, to dispense with the idea that menstruation is determinative of a very specific gender and social identity and the subsequent normative and reductionist take on menstrual experience (and more generally human experience).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guilló-Arakistain, M. (2020). Challenging Menstrual Normativity: Nonessentialist Body Politics and Feminist Epistemologies of Health. In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies (pp. 869–883). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0614-7_63

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free