Reversible contraceptive effect of PH-20 immunization in male guinea pigs

39Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sperm proteins are currently being studied as antigens on which to base a contraceptive vaccine. Sperm plasma membrane proteins offer the theoretical possibility of immunizing either males or females and achieving a contraceptive effect. In this study, we investigated the sperm plasma membrane protein PH-20 as an antigen for inducing infertility in males. We found that infertility can reproducibly be induced in male guinea pigs immunized with purified PH-20: 100% (29 of 29) of PH-20-immunized males became infertile, whereas all 22 controls were fertile. The males were extremely responsive to PH-20 immunization: infertility could be induced with a single injection of only 5 μg PH-20. Among males that received their initial injection when they were ~300 g (body weight), 14 of 15 had regained fertility at about 1 yr after initial injection. Surprisingly, in another group of males that received their first injection when they were ~650 g (body weight), only 1 of 5 had regained fertility about 1 yr after initial injection. Anti-PH-20 titers in antisera (2 mo after initial injection) were generally in the range 1.1-4.2 x 104 in twice-injected males and the range 1.8-9.4 x 103 in once-injected males. Over the next 6-11 mo, twice-injected males' titers decreased ≤ 4-fold, whereas once-injected males' titers decreased slightly (1.1- to 1.8-fold). After 6-11 mo, anti-PH-20 titers were in the range 1.0-4.8 x 103, and the precise residual titer did not correlate with fertility/infertility. The results show that immunization of males with PH-20, even at low doses, results in a reproducible, completely effective contraceptive action.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Primakoff, P., Woolman-Gamer, L., Tung, K. S. K., & Myles, D. G. (1997). Reversible contraceptive effect of PH-20 immunization in male guinea pigs. Biology of Reproduction, 56(5), 1142–1146. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod56.5.1142

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free