Randomised comparison of the AMBU AuraOnce laryngeal mask and the LMA unique laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing adults

8Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We conducted a randomised single-blind controlled trial comparing the LMA-Unique (LMAU) and the AMBU AuraOnce (AMBU) disposable laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia. Eighty-two adult patients (ASA status I-IV) were randomly allocated to receive the LMAU or AMBU and were blinded to device selection. Patients received a standardized anesthetic and all airway devices were inserted by trained anaesthetists. Size selection was guided by manufacturer recommendations. All data were collected by a single, unblinded observer. When compared with the LMAU, the AMBU produced significantly higher airway sealing pressures (AMBU 20±6; LMAU 15±cm H2O; P=0.001). There was no statistical difference between the two devices for overall success rate, insertion time, number of adjustments, laryngeal alignment, blood-staining, and sore throat (P≥0.05). The AMBU AuraOnce disposable laryngeal mask provided a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure compared to the LMA Unique in spontaneously breathing adult patients. Copyright © 2012 Daryl Lindsay Williams et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, D. L., Zeng, J. M., Alexander, K. D., & Andrews, D. T. (2012). Randomised comparison of the AMBU AuraOnce laryngeal mask and the LMA unique laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing adults. Anesthesiology Research and Practice, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/405812

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free