THE ROLE OF INDONESIAN MEDICAL DISCIPLINARY BOARD’S VERDICT ON MEDICAL DISCIPLINARY VIOLATION IN MEDICAL DISPUTES SETTLEMENT

  • Alawiya N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Whether there is medical disciplinary violation or not is decided by Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board (MKDKI) according to the mandate also grants right for every person whose interest are violated by a doctor or dentist's act during their medical practice to report the alleged criminal offense to the authority or file a civil lawsuit to court. The provision potentially weakens MKDKI's verdict role in medical dispute settlement. The result shows that MKDKI in medical dispute settlement contribute to provide written real evidence. It can be medical dispute settlement by mediation, a report to the authority or a suit to court. The role of MKDKI's verdict is still hampered by several factors including law, law enforcement, facilities and cultural factors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alawiya, N.-. (2017). THE ROLE OF INDONESIAN MEDICAL DISCIPLINARY BOARD’S VERDICT ON MEDICAL DISCIPLINARY VIOLATION IN MEDICAL DISPUTES SETTLEMENT. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 17(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.1.647

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free