This study aims to emphasize students’ views on using unfair means in e-learning programmes in English at undergraduate level. The research examines further how they trick, why they trick, and possible approaches to decrease this unfair practice. This investigation was carried out after the second half of 2020 when the whole world was witnessing the impact of COVID. Data from 60 students of undergraduate programmes in English offered different Indian universities in correspondence mode have been obtained. This study utilized a mixed-method research strategy by use of a tailor-made, fourteen closed-ended and one open-ended item questionnaire. Frequency and percentage analysis was performed in the quantitative portion and open questions were thematically analyzed. The data show that the majority of students cheated on others by receiving the right answers from or sending the right answers to their peers. Another technique, as claimed by some of them, being employed was copying answers from electronic website susing the internet resources and then pasting them onto the screen of the exam portal. The survey further indicated that grounds for fraudulent e-learning programmes, often without virtual classrooms, were not always attributable to technical difficulties and to students who wished to graduate and gain knowledge.
CITATION STYLE
Benyo, A., Alkhaza’leh, B. A., & Kumar, T. (2022). Using unfair means in undergraduate E-learning programmes in English: An analytical survey. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i1.6761
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.