Three-dimensional electron backscatter diffraction (3D-EBSD) has emerged as a powerful technique for generating 3D crystallographic information of a microstructure at the micro to nanoscale [1]. Typically the technique uses a focused Ga + ion beam (FIB) for high precision (> 10 nm per slice) serial sectioning generating consecutive ion milled cross sections with each milled surface subsequently mapped using EBSD. The successive EBSD maps are combined using a suitable post-processing method to generate a crystallographic volume of the microstructure [1] and subsequent analyses, e.g. grain size, grains and grain boundary orientation statistics, etc. A principal limitation of Ga + FIBs in their application to typical engineering or industrial applications is low milling rates of various materials irradiated with Ga+ ions and maximum FIB current of 60 nA [2], practically limiting the volume of excavated material to about (50 µm) 3 this is problematic as many engineering materials have grain size many 10's of microns which this technique cannot meaningfully investigate. Emerging dual beam Xe + Plasma FIB-SEM (PFIB-SEM) systems not only allows removal rates some 20-50× faster [2], but also appear to generate less damage (amorphisation, implantation, phase transformation, etc.) than Ga + ions [2]. Volumes some 1000× greater and many times deeper than can be accessed using PFIB dual beam microscopes and promise to radically extend our capability for 3D tomography, 3D EDX, 3D EBSD as well as correlative tomography [3]. Here we examine the potential of Xe + PFIB-SEM for site-specific preparation of large volume blocks (250 × 150 × 150 µm 3) for 3D-EBSD of shot-peened AA7075 aluminum alloy below sharp notches [4] and around a stress corrosion crack tip in AA7032 aluminum alloy [5]. As a practical example in this study we used two aluminum alloys, AA7075 and AA7032. The material volumes for subsequent EBSD study are situated in locations typically not accessible by conventional 3D-EBSD: the notch tip of shot-peened 7075 and stress corrosion crack tip extracted from a compact tension specimen with the region of interest identified in using X-Ray micro Computed Tomography [4]. Sample preparation is presented elsewhere [4, 5]. For the site-specific preparation of large volume blocks we used FEI Helios Xe + Plasma Focused Ion Beam-SEM microscope equipped with Pt metal-organic gas injection system (GIS) and FEI EasyLift TM micromanipulator. The samples were mounted on 45 tilt sample holders. Excavated blocks were mounted to standard TEM grid attached using sliver dag to 54 degree face of EBSD sample holder. We have developed the following workflow to enable these type of measurements: (a) After finding the specific location a 4 µm thick Pt protective layer of 250 × 150 µm 2 (Figure 1a) was sputtered on the top surface using gas injection system (GIS) and PFIB; (b) Large side trenches with a lamella-like ligament on the left side of the block were milled at normal angle to the top surface near the Pt cup using 1.3 µA @ 30 kV (Figure 1a), regular (RCS) and cleaning cross-section (CCS); (c) A back trench was milled using the same PFIB settings but at 88 angle to the top surface (Figure 1a). This allowed obtaining right angle between the top surface and the back face; (d) Subsequently, the sample was rotated by 180 and the bottom face of the block and a thin ligament was milled using the same PFIB settings at angle about 2 to the top surface (Figure 1b); (e) The stage was tilted to 45, so the top 838
CITATION STYLE
Winiarski, B., Burnett, T. L., & Withers, P. J. (2016). A Xe + Plasma FIB Milling and Lift-out Approach for Site-specific Preparation of Large Volume Blocks for 3D-EBSD. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 22(S3), 838–839. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1431927616005031
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.