Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities of skin mechanical properties measured in healthy individuals using skin elasticity meter

8Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to establish a standardized measurement method and to examine the intra- and inter-reliabilities and absolute reliability of measuring skin mechanical properties using a skin elasticity meter (Cutometer®). Methods: Ten healthy participated in the study. Skin mechanical properties were measured at four sites: upper arm, lower arm, upper leg and lower leg on both sides in supine position using a non-invasive skin elasticity meter by two trained different raters. The measurements include quantitative indices of the maximal distensibility (R0), elasticity (R2, R5, R7), and viscoelasticity (R6). Intra- and inter- relative reliabilities were determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1,1) and ICC (2,1) methods, respectively. The absolute reliability was assessed via the Bland-Altman analysis. Moreover, we evaluated the minimal detectable change at a 95% confidence level (MDC95). Results: At each site, the ICC (1,1) values were >0.90, and the ICC (2,1) values were >0.50. The Bland–Altman analysis did not reveal any fixed errors, and several sites and parameters have proportional errors. Conclusions: In this study, intra- and inter-reliabilities were measured at “excellent” and more than “moderate” levels, respectively. However, because some proportional errors were observed, the limits of reliability agreement should be considered when using the proposed methods. We believe that the results of this study can be applied to clinical research in field of rehabilitation treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fujimoto, Y., Yuri, Y., Kato, Y., Kinoshita, S., & Tamiya, H. (2023). Intra- and inter-rater reliabilities of skin mechanical properties measured in healthy individuals using skin elasticity meter. Annals of Medicine, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2279747

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free