The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent

17Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is sometimes argued that autonomous decision-making requires that the decision-maker’s desires are authentic, i.e., “genuine,” “truly her own,” “not out of character,” or similar. In this article, it is argued that a method to reliably determine the authenticity (or inauthenticity) of a desire cannot be developed. A taxonomy of characteristics displayed by different theories of authenticity is introduced and applied to evaluate such theories categorically, in contrast to the prior approach of treating them individually. The conclusion is drawn that, in practice, the authenticity of desires cannot be reliably determined. It is suggested that authenticity should therefore not be employed in informed consent practices in healthcare.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahlin, J. (2018). The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 21(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9783-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free