Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy after failed gastric banding: is it really effective? Six years of follow-up

11Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a valuable surgical option to rescue laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) failures. Objectives The aim of this study was to determine whether conversion to LSG after failed LAGB (CLSG) is a well-tolerated and effective rescue procedure compared with primary LSG (PLSG) in the long term. Setting University hospital, France. Methods A retrospective review of data concerning consecutive patients receiving a LSG between February 2008 and December 2014 was conducted. Mortality, postoperative complications, and weight loss outcomes were analyzed. Results Of 701 LSG, 601 (85.7%) were PLSG and 100 (14.3%) were CLSG. The mortality rate was 0%. Overall morbidity was comparable between the primary and conversion group (10% versus 6%, P =.27). The mean percentage of excess weight loss at 3, 36, and 72 months was 34.9%, 72.1%, and 57.2% after PLSG and 22.6%, 51.2% and 29.8% after CLSG (P <50%) was higher in the CLSG group during the first 5 postoperative years (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carandina, S., Genser, L., Bossi, M., Polliand, C., Tabbara, M., & Barrat, C. (2017). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy after failed gastric banding: is it really effective? Six years of follow-up. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 13(7), 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.02.008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free