Imaging gastric cancer with PET and the radiotracers 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG: A comparative analysis

119Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this pilot study, we evaluated 3′-deoxy-3′- 18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET for the detection of gastric cancer and compared the diagnostic accuracy with that of 18F-FDG PET. Methods: Forty-five patients (31 male and 14 female) with histologically proven locally advanced gastric cancer underwent attenuation-corrected whole-body 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT (lowdose CT). 18F-FLT emission images were acquired on a full-ring PET scanner 45 min after the injection of 270-340 MBq of 18FFLT. 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed 60 min after the injection of 300-370 MBq of 18F-FDG. Mean standardized uptake values for 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG were calculated using circular ROIs (diameter, 1.5 cm) in the primary tumor manifestation site, in a reference segment of the liver, and in the bone marrow and were compared on a lesion-by-lesion basis. Results: According to the Lauren classification, 15 tumors (33%) were of the intestinal subtype and 30 (67%) of the nonintestinal subtype. 18F-FLT PET images showed high contrast for the primary tumor and proliferating bone marrow. In all patients (45/45), focal 18F-FLT uptake could be detected in the primary tumor. In contrast, 14 primary tumors were negative for 18F-FDG uptake, with lesional 18FFDG uptake lower than or similar to background activity. The mean standardized uptake value for 18F-FLT in malignant primaries was 6.0 ± 2.5 (range, 2.4-12.7). In the subgroup of 18F-FDG-positive patients, the mean value for 18F-FDG was 8.4 ± 4.1 (range, 3.8/19.0), versus 6.8 ± 2.6 for 18F-FLT (Wilcoxon test: P = 0.03). Comparison of mean 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake in tumors with signet ring cells revealed no statistically significant difference between the tracers (6.2 ± 2.1 for 18F-FLT vs. 6.4 ± 2.8 for 18F-FDG; Wilcoxon test: P = 0.94). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that imaging gastric cancer with the proliferation marker 18F-FLT is feasible. 18F-FLT PET was more sensitive than 18F-FDG PET, especially in tumors frequently presenting without or with low 18F-FDG uptake, and may improve early evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment. Copyright © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herrmann, K., Ott, K., Buck, A. K., Lordick, F., Wilhelm, D., Souvatzoglou, M., … Krause, B. J. (2007). Imaging gastric cancer with PET and the radiotracers 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG: A comparative analysis. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 48(12), 1945–1950. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.044867

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free