Home-Based FeNO Monitoring with the Vivatmo me Device Reveals Type 2 Inflammatory Patterns of Patients with Asthma at Different Treatment Steps: The FeNO@Home Study

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is an important type 2 (T2) asthma biomarker. Home-based FeNO monitoring can provide longitudinal data better reflecting the variable nature of T2 inflammation versus single-point data. We sought to compare longitudinal mean FeNO and variability (CV) in relation to asthma control, and to compare detection rate of T2FeNO inflammation at diagnostic (≥ 40 ppb in GINA 1) and on-treatment (≥ 25 ppb in GINA 2–5) cutoffs during home versus clinic measurements. Methods: This was an observational study with once-daily home-based FeNO (Vivatmo me) and symptom diary in patients with asthma of different GINA steps performed over 3 months. Clinic FeNO, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and 5-item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores were also collected at two visits (enrolment/study end). Results: We enrolled 85 patients (n = 23 step 1, n = 37 steps 2–3, and n = 25 steps 4–5). Mean FeNO over 3 months was highest in uncontrolled steps 4–5 (p = 0.006), and FeNO variability in steps 2–3 (p = 0.046). Subjects with optimal control (ACQ < 0.75 both visits) had comparable mean FeNO values, but fewer patients with CV above the median vs. suboptimally controlled patients (39.1% vs. 54.1%; p = 0.03). In GINA 1, FeNO CV was lower in optimally controlled patients (p = 0.10). Mean FeNO was higher on symptomatic asthma days, particularly in step 1 (p = 0.002), with similar trends during loss of asthma control phases. Home FeNO increased the detection rate of T2FeNO inflammation at a diagnostic cutoff (≥ 40 ppb, step 1) from 8.7% (clinic FeNO) to 47.8% of subjects, and of on-treatment T2FeNO inflammation in GINA steps 2–3 and 4–5 from 58.3% to 83.3%, and 64% to 96%, respectively. Conclusion: Home-based FeNO provides important information about airway inflammation, distinct and complementary to symptom control. Detection of T2FeNO inflammation is facilitated at all GINA steps at diagnostic and predictive/prognostic cutoffs, with important implications for management and diagnosis. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) DRKS00029118, registered July 1, 2022.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beeh, K. M., Harrison, T., Heffler, E., Timmermann, H., Weber, S., & Wegner, S. (2026). Home-Based FeNO Monitoring with the Vivatmo me Device Reveals Type 2 Inflammatory Patterns of Patients with Asthma at Different Treatment Steps: The FeNO@Home Study. Pulmonary Therapy, 12(1), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-025-00336-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free