Interelectrode distance and warning signal interval and the evaluation of clinical electrical shock

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Contingent shock is used on a small scale for behaviors that may lead to severe damages to one's body or to others. Research efforts focus on exploring variables that control the evaluation of electrical shocks. This study focuses on two practical questions, that is, whether the distance between the electrodes would influence the evaluation of shock and whether using a variable time interval in the administration would influence the evaluation of shock. Results reveal that both investigated variables control the evaluation of shock. Multiple shocks appear to produce a stronger sensation than single shocks, a phenomenon that was also revealed in previous studies. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duker, P., Mulder, M., & Scheffer, N. (2009). Interelectrode distance and warning signal interval and the evaluation of clinical electrical shock. Behavioral Interventions, 24(4), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.290

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free